“Pippin” revolutionized Broadway at the time of its debut in 1972. With a daring structure and an innovation of metalanguage, the musical won five Tony Awards for telling the tale of Prince Pippin, the heir to the throne of King Charlemagne, which follows a troubled existential journey in search of the meaning of life. Told by a theatrical troupe, the saga is led by a Leading Player and the music of Stephen Schwartz, author of “Godspell” (1971), “Wicked” (2003) and winner of Oscar, Grammy and Golden Globe awards. 

A narrative ensemble invites the audience to immerse themselves in the magic of theater and accompany the vicissitudes of Pippin’s turbulent life. In a journey of self discovery, he faces battles, experiences power, simplicity and love.

It is a musical with a lot more substance and layers than one might originally assume. “Pippin” is a cynical comedy that features an absolutely modern protagonist, full of doubts and questions and with an existential void that can never be fulfilled. So much so, it has been dubbed the “Hamlet” of musicals. He rejects old cliches and breaks with some traditions of the genre. As if that were not enough, it takes up the idea of ​​the “theater of life within the theater of stage” and invites a theatrical group and the figure of the Leading Player to tell the story.

When I first saw this musical in high school, I must admit I did not love it as equally, as I had grown rapidly passionate about other musicals I encountered. The meta aspect of “Pippin” was its most creative and interesting development, and the ending related a sincere and profound moral. However, if I would have only reviewed my experience of the musical then, I would rate “Pippin” a moderate  3 out of 5 shamrocks. There were moments when I felt the story was dragging, and the writers inserted reflective songs without much narrative development to compensate. The jokes grew overused and crude, distracting from the uneventful plot.

I am glad, however, that Notre Dame students managed to make my second experience of the show considerably more enjoyable. Directed by senior Nick Buranicz, the department of Film, Television and Theatre developed a youthful and animating production. Although I had originally taken a more moderate liking of the play, Notre Dame’s “Pippin” earned 5 out of 5 shamrocks.

The actors were comical and idiosyncratic without being overbearing — except, of course, for the one character who is meant to be domineering, the brilliant and hilarious Charlemagne (Timothy Merkle). Pippin himself (Carlos Macias) perfectly captured the bright-eyed naivety of the character. His sweet and mellow rendition of “Corner of the Sky” was moving and ideal. Both the Leading Player (Evelyn Berry) and Fastrada (Olivia Seymour) superbly capture their characters’ scheming wiliness and oustanding charm. Grandma Berthe (Gavriella Aviva Lund) was especially vibrant as she led the audience through the chorus of “No Time at All,” and Catherine (Kate Turner) taught the audience the value of simple pleasures with her agreeable disposition. That is to say nothing of the fantastic vocals and each actor’s ingenious doubling as a member of the ensemble.

The scenes balanced the humor and philosophical weight of the show. Despite its great comedic moments, this version of “Pippin” seemed less rough and more principled. The cast of “Pippin” gave the ending its proper meaning, which is, of course, memorable for its rejection of the desire for extraordinary pyrotechnics in life and the exaltation of the menial and familiar. 

Choreography was marvelously executed, with much color and vivacity. Further, the set was also innovative, using gymnastics mats to construct each fluid scene. The rapidness and large-scale transitions with these mats were nothing short of impressive. Finally, the costumes were well-suited, given the unique and lively nature of the show.

Contact Marcelle at mcouto@nd.edu

You must be logged in to post a comment.

P.O. Box 779, Notre Dame, IN 46556

024 South Dining Hall, Notre Dame, IN46556

The Observer is the independent newspaper serving Notre Dame, Saint Mary's and Holy Cross.

We have been publishing since 1966.

Our motto is "To uncover the truth, and report it accurately."

The Observer accepts advertisements Monday to Friday. Email ads@ndsmcobserver.com for rate information.

There are many ways to get involved with The Observer: as a writer, designer, photographer or videographer. To learn about how your talents may best serve The Observer, email editor@ndsmcobserver.com.

Email editor@ndsmcobserver.com or call (574) 631-7471 with any questions or concerns.

Viewpoint space is available to all readers. The free expression of all opinions through letters is encouraged. Letters must be signed and must include contact information. We make our best effort to publish all letters that we receive. We ask that you keep letters to a reasonable length.

You must email letters directly to the Viewpoint editor at viewpoint@ndsmcobserver.com. Any published letters or columns are subject to Observer editing policies and copyright. Said material may not be removed/redacted from our platform unless there are factual inaccuracies, in which case the error will subsequently be corrected and the remaining article left unchanged.

Submitting any Letter is subject to the full Viewpoint policy posted below. Please ensure that you have read and fully understand the entirety of the policy.

Anyone is welcome to submit Letters to the Editor, guest columns, quotes, cartoons, comic strips and poems to the Viewpoint Department of The Observer. Items submitted by members of the Notre Dame, Saint Mary’s and Holy Cross community will be given preference for publication.

The opinions expressed in the Viewpoint section are not necessarily those of The Observer. Columns, Letters to the Editor, poems, comic strips, cartoons and quotes are commentaries.

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the majority of the Editor-in-Chief, the Managing Editor, Assistant Managing Editors and Department Editors.

All commentaries submitted to The Observer must include the name and phone number or email of the author, as well as class and graduation year if applicable. Letters to the Editor may not exceed 750 words, and columns may not exceed 900 words, though exceptions are made at the discretion of the Viewpoint Editor. The Viewpoint Editor may shorten any Letter or column regardless of length or deem it worthy of print in its entirety.

The Observer does not print anonymous Letters to the Editor, columns, comic strips, cartoons, quotes or poems. A majority of the Editorial Board may override this provision if the submission is irreplaceably relevant and the author has a legitimate reason for anonymity.

All material submitted to the Viewpoint Department, including columns, poems, Letters to the Editor, comic strips and cartoons, becomes property of The Observer. Any further use of these commentaries without the written consent of The Observer is prohibited. 

The Observer does not publish material, including columns, poems, Letters to the Editor, comic strips and cartoons, that have already been published elsewhere. This includes other news media sites, blogs and social media platforms.

Not-for-profit organizations, those organizations which have a reciprocal usage agreement and those organizations of which The Observer is a member may be granted permission to publish commentaries with the permission of the Editor-in-Chief or the permission of the Managing Editor and the Viewpoint Editor.

In exceptions, the author of the previously printed material must give legal, written consent or work from organizations of which The Observer is a member. Syndicated columns are excluded from this procedure.

The Viewpoint Department reserves the right to edit all commentaries. The Observer is committed to fostering civil discourse and has no obligation to print submitted commentaries. Such works will not be printed if they are libelous, unintelligible, irrelevant, obscene or contain ad hominem statements regarding private figures. The Observer will not publish commentaries deemed uncivil at the discretion of the editors. All commentaries will be read by at least the Viewpoint Editor, nightly Viewpoint Editor and the nightly Managing Editor.

All facts that require citation must be cited in the submitted material. Submissions must include primary sources that contributed to an author’s argument. The Observer editors reserve the right to reject any given source if it is not primary source material, although exceptions may be made at the discretion of the editors.

Commentaries submitted as Letters to the Editor may not exceed three in number from the same individual or organization within the same academic semester. There is no limit to the number of times an individual or organization may have their commentaries appear in print as columnists.

All commentaries printed in the Viewpoint section must be fact-checked before publication. It is not guaranteed that authors of columns, Letters to the Editor, quotes, comic strips, cartoons and poems will be notified before their work is printed in The Observer.

Only those individuals authorized to speak as representatives for a group will be allowed to use the organization’s name. In such cases, the primary author(s) of the commentary is (are) the individual(s), and the commentary is, in effect, co-signed by the organization.

Paid employees of The Observer are not permitted to have their commentaries appear in the Viewpoint section as Letters to the Editor. Regular columnists and members of the Viewpoint staff are also not eligible to have their commentaries appear in the Viewpoint section as Letters to the Editor. The status of such individuals is determined by the Viewpoint Editor.

Viewpoint columnist applicants must fill out and submit the Viewpoint Columnist application to the Viewpoint Editor. Columnists are hired at the discretion of the Viewpoint Editor. Hiring is done before each school semester begins and at the discretion of the Viewpoint Editor.

The Observer reserves the right to remove comments on The Observer’s website if the editors deem them offensive, lewd, obscene or in poor taste in any fashion. The Observer also reserves the right to ban accounts or disable comments on some or all of the website content in reaction to an abuse of the comment function.

Cartoons and comic strips are considered part of the Viewpoint section although they appear in the Classifieds section. Cartoons and comic strips will be approved by the Viewpoint Editor and the nightly Managing Editor. The editors reserve the right to refuse to run any cartoon or comic strip that the editors deem offensive, discriminatory or hateful at the discretion of the editors.

The views expressed in all commentaries published in The Observer Viewpoint section are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.

The Editorial Board has the authority and discretion to apply and amend this policy as a majority of its members see fit.

Any questions or concerns regarding The Observer Viewpoint policies should be directed to the Viewpoint Editor at viewpoint@ndsmcobserver.com.